Talk:Ducal Palace, Urbino

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as High-importance).

World Heritage Sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

User:Northglen added the following paragraph on 2006-10-09:

The Ducal Palace is best remembered by the conversations which took place in the Hall of Vigils in 1517. They are recorded in The Book of the Courtier by Baldassarre Castiglione. In his book Civilization Kenneth Clark states, "For over a hundred years it formed everyone's notion of good manners. Actually it is much more than a handbook on polite behaviour, because Castiglione's ideal of a gentleman is based on real human values." The book ends "with a moving discourse on the subject of love...(It) unites the medieval concept of chivalry with the ideal love of Plato."

Apart from spelling and style errors (corrected here), frankly cannot see the relevance of this in the article devoted to Ducal Palace. Can one really think that one of the most important Renaissance palaces of the world is "best remembered" for such a stuff? And who's Kenneth Clark? Let me know and good work!!--Attilios 23:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Well, Kenneth Clark is notable enough for an encyclopedia article, and the setting of Castiglione's famous book here is one of the most notable things about the Palazzo Ducale. While Clark's praise of the Book of the Courtier itself may not belong here, I'm restoring what was valuable in Northglen's contribution to the article. Wareh 20:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cost

The 1903 edition of the Book of the Courtier lists a footnote expressing the cost of building the palace at £400,000. However, that would be in 1903 (or therabouts) pounds. Any idea what that would be in today's money? (This is in footnote 447). The Jade Knight (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to this calculator, that's equivalent in today's money to £32 million (using the retail price index) or £172 million (using average earnings). Wareh (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Architectural praise and opinion deleted

It must be assumed that the uncited opinions on the design of the Palace, which I removed, were the editor's own, which violates NPOV policy. There are Sources listed, and if those are the sources on which the deleted text was based, then they should have been cited internally. Otherwise, the attribution of the design of the Palace after Laurana can only be speculation, i.e. POV. The works in the Sources section, which I did not delete, came after the Clark source (and in 1969 Kenneth Clark was a preeminent art scholar), so if they provide a scholarly updating of knowledge about who built the Palace, then they should be cited specifically and by page, by footnotes in the narrative. — J M Rice (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:58, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]